Pass4Test는 여러분이VMware 인증2V0-13.24인증시험 패스와 추후사업에 모두 도움이 되겠습니다. Pass4Test제품을 선택함으로 여러분은 시간도 절약하고 돈도 절약하는 일석이조의 득을 얻을수 있습니다. 또한 구매후 일년무료 업데이트 버전을 받을수 있는 기회를 얻을수 있습니다. VMware 인증2V0-13.24 인증시험패스는 아주 어렵습니다. 자기에 맞는 현명한 학습자료 선택은 성공의 지름길을 내딛는 첫발입니다. 퍼펙트한 자료만이 시험에서 성공할수 있습니다. Pass4Test시험문제와 답이야 말로 퍼펙트한 자료이죠. Pass4Test VMware 인증2V0-13.24인증시험자료는 100% 패스보장을 드립니다.
주제 | 소개 |
---|---|
주제 1 |
|
주제 2 |
|
주제 3 |
|
주제 4 |
|
주제 5 |
|
요즘 같은 인재가 많아지는 사회에도 많은 업계에서는 아직도 관련인재가 부족하다고 합니다.it업계에서도 이러한 상황입니다.VMware 2V0-13.24시험은 it인증을 받을 수 있는 좋은 시험입니다. 그리고Pass4Test는VMware 2V0-13.24덤프를 제공하는 사이트입니다.
질문 # 39
When creating a physical design for a VMware Cloud Foundation environment, which of the following is the most critical prerequisite?
Response:
정답:A
질문 # 40
As part of a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) design, an architect is responsible for planning for the migration of existing workloads using HCX to a new VCF environment. Which two prerequisites would the architect require to complete the objective? (Choose two.)
정답:A,D
설명:
VMware HCX (Hybrid Cloud Extension) is a key workload migration tool in VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, enabling seamless movement of VMs between on-premises environments and VCF instances (or between VCF instances). To plan an HCX-based migration, the architect must ensure prerequisites are met for deployment, connectivity, and operation. Let's evaluate each option:
Option A: Extended IP spaces for all moving workloadsThis is incorrect. HCX supports migrations with or without extending IP spaces. Features like HCX vMotion and Bulk Migration allow VMs to retain their IP addresses (Layer 2 extension via Network Extension), while HCX Mobility Optimized Networking (MON) can adapt IPs if needed. Extended IP space is a design choice, not a prerequisite, making this option unnecessary for completing the objective.
Option B: DRS enabled within the VCF instanceThis is incorrect. VMware Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) optimizes VM placement and load balancing within a cluster but is not required for HCX migrations.
HCX operates independently of DRS, handling VM mobility across environments (e.g., from a source vSphere to a VCF destination). While DRS might enhance resource management post-migration, it's not a prerequisite for HCX functionality.
Option C: Service accounts for the applicable appliancesThis is correct. HCX requires service accounts with appropriate permissions to interact with source anddestination environments (e.g., vCenter Server, NSX).
In VCF 5.2, HCX appliances (e.g., HCX Manager, Interconnect, WAN Optimizer) need credentials to authenticate and perform operations like VM discovery, migration, and network extension. The architect must ensure these accounts are configured with sufficient privileges (e.g., read/write access in vCenter), making this a critical prerequisite.
Option D: NSX Federation implemented between the VCF instancesThis is incorrect. NSX Federation is a multi-site networking construct for unified policy management across NSX deployments, but it's not required for HCX migrations. HCX leverages its own Network Extension service to stretch Layer 2 networks between sites, independent of NSX Federation. While NSX is part of VCF, Federation is an advanced feature unrelated to HCX's core migration capabilities.
Option E: Active Directory configured as an authentication sourceThis is correct. In VCF 5.2, HCX integrates with the VCF identity management framework, which typically uses Active Directory (AD) via vSphere SSO for authentication. Configuring AD as an authentication source ensures that HCX administrators can log in using centralized credentials, aligning with VCF's security model. This is a prerequisite for managing HCX appliances and executing migrations securely.
Conclusion:The two prerequisites required for HCX migration in VCF 5.2 areservice accounts for the applicable appliances(Option C) to enable HCX operations andActive Directory configured as an authentication source(Option E) for secure access management. These align with HCX deployment and integration requirements in the VCF ecosystem.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: HCX Integration) VMware HCX User Guide (VCF 5.2 compatible): Prerequisites and Configuration VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Identity and Access Management)
질문 # 41
When creating a physical design for VMware Cloud Foundation's Edge Cluster, which consideration is essential?
Response:
정답:B
질문 # 42
Which design decision is critical for enabling self-service and governance in VMware Cloud Foundation?
Response:
정답:D
질문 # 43
An administrator is documenting the design for a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) solution. During discovery workshops with the customer, the following information was shared with the architect:
All users and administrators of the solution will need to be authenticated using accounts in the corporate directory service.
The solution will need to be deployed across two geographically separate locations and run in an Active
/Standby configuration where supported.
The management applications deployed as part of the solution will need to be recovered to the standby location in the event of a disaster.
All management applications will need to be deployed into a management tooling zone of the network, which is separated from the corporate network zone by multiple firewalls.
The corporate directory service is deployed in the corporate zone.
There is an internal organization policy that requires each application instance (management or end user) to detail the ports that access is required on through the firewall separately.
Firewall rule requests are processed manually one application instance at a time and typically take a minimum of 8 weeks to complete.
The customer also informed the architect that the new solution needs to be deployed and ready to start the organization's acceptance into service process within 3 months, as it is a dependency in the deployment of a business-critical application. When considering the design for the Cloud Automationand Operations products within the VCF solution, which three design decisions should the architect include based on this information?
(Choose three.)
정답:B,C,E
설명:
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, Cloud Automation (e.g., Aria Automation) and Operations (e.g., Aria Operations) products rely on identity management for authentication. The customer's requirements- corporate directory authentication, Active/Standby across two sites, disaster recovery (DR), network zoning, slow firewall processes, and a 3-month deployment timeline-shape the design decisions. The architect must ensure authentication works efficiently across sites while meeting the timeline and DR needs. Let's evaluate:
Key Constraints and Context:
Authentication: All users/administrators use the corporate directory (e.g., Active Directory in the corporate zone).
Deployment: Active/Standby across two sites, with management apps in a separate tooling zone behind firewalls.
DR: Management apps must recover to the standby site.
Firewall Delays: 8-week minimum per rule, but deployment must occur within 12 weeks (3 months).
Identity Broker: In VCF, VMware Workspace ONE Access (or similar) acts as an identity broker, bridging VCF components with external directories (e.g., AD via LDAP/S).
Evaluation of Options:
Option A: The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be reconfigured to integrate with the Identity Broker solution instance at the standby site in case of a Disaster Recovery incident This implies a single Identity Broker at the primary site, with reconfiguration to a standby instance post-DR.
Reconfiguring products (e.g., updating SSO endpoints) during DR adds complexity and downtime, contradicting the Active/Standby goal of seamless failover. It's feasible but not optimal given the need for continuous operation and the 3-month timeline.
Option B: The Identity Broker solution will be deployed at both the primary and standby site This is correct. Deploying Workspace ONE Access (or equivalent) at both sites supports Active/Standby by ensuring authentication availability at the primary site and immediate usability at the standby site post-DR. It aligns with VCF's multi-site HA capabilities and avoids reconfiguration delays, addressing the DR requirement efficiently within the timeline.
Option C: The Identity Broker solution will be connected with the corporate directory service for user authentication This is correct. The requirement states all users/administrators authenticate via the corporate directory (in the corporate zone). An Identity Broker (e.g., Workspace ONE Access) connects to AD via LDAP/S, acting as a proxy between the management tooling zone and corporate zone. This satisfies the authentication need and simplifies firewall rules (one broker-to-AD connection vs. multiple app connections), critical given the 8- week delay.
Option D: The Identity Broker solution will be deployed at the primary site and failed over to the standby site in case of a disaster This suggests a single Identity Broker with DR failover. While possible (e.g., via vSphere Replication), it risks authentication downtime during failover, conflicting with Active/Standby continuity. The 8-week firewall rule delay for the standby site's broker connection post-DR also jeopardizes the 3-month timeline and DR readiness, making this less viable than dual-site deployment (B).
Option E: The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be integrated with a single instance of an Identity Broker solution at the primary site This is correct. Integrating Aria products with one Identity Broker instance at the primary site during initial deployment simplifies setup and meets the 3-month timeline. It leverages the broker deployed at the primary site (part of B) for authentication, minimizing firewall rules (one broker vs. multiple apps). Pairing this with a standby instance (B) ensures DR readiness without immediate complexity.
Option F: The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be integrated directly with the corporate directory service This is incorrect. Direct integration requires each product (e.g., Aria Automation, Operations) to connect to AD across the firewall, necessitating multiple rule requests. With an 8-week minimum per rule and several products, this exceeds the 3-month timeline. It also complicates DR, as each app would need re-pointing to a standby AD, violating efficiency and zoning policies.
Conclusion:
The three design decisions are:
B: Identity Broker at both sites ensures Active/Standby and DR readiness.
C: Connecting the broker to the corporate directory fulfills the authentication requirement and simplifies firewall rules.
E: Integrating products with a primary-site broker meets the 3-month deployment goal while leveraging B and C for DR.This trio balances timeline, security, and DR needs in VCF 5.2.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Identity and Access Management) VMware Aria Automation 8.10 Documentation (integrated in VCF 5.2): Authentication Design VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Multi-Site and DR Considerations)
질문 # 44
......
Pass4Test에서 출시한 VMware인증 2V0-13.24덤프는 실제시험문제 커버율이 높아 시험패스율이 가장 높습니다. VMware인증 2V0-13.24시험을 통과하여 자격증을 취득하면 여러방면에서 도움이 됩니다. Pass4Test에서 출시한 VMware인증 2V0-13.24덤프를 구매하여VMware인증 2V0-13.24시험을 완벽하게 준비하지 않으실래요? Pass4Test의 실력을 증명해드릴게요.
2V0-13.24인기자격증 인증시험자료: https://www.pass4test.net/2V0-13.24.html
to enroll in our safety training programs and take the first step toward a safer future.